
Anchoring Bias: Why the First Price You See Matters So Much
Have you ever seen a product “originally” priced at $4,999 but “now only” $1,999 and felt like you were getting a bargain - even without knowing what it’s actually worth? That reaction is driven by anchoring bias, a powerful mental shortcut where the first number you see becomes a reference point for all later judgments. Anchoring affects everything from online shopping and salary negotiations to credit‑card repayments and home‑buying decisions, and it quietly shapes how much you spend, save, and invest
For HENRYs navigating big financial decisions in expensive cities, understanding anchoring is essential if you want to stop other people’s numbers from silently steering your choices.
What is anchoring bias?
Anchoring bias (or the anchoring effect) is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information encountered when making a decision, and then adjust only partially away from it.
-
In a famous experiment by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, participants spun a rigged wheel showing a random number, then estimated the percentage of African countries in the UN. Those who saw a higher random number consistently gave much higher estimates than those who saw a lower number - even though the wheel outcome was obviously unrelated. [1]
-
Follow‑up research across many domains confirms that once an anchor is set, later judgments remain skewed toward it, even when people know the anchor is arbitrary. [2]
In practice, this means that list prices, “was/now” comparisons, first salary offers, opening bids, and even minimum credit‑card payments can all serve as anchors that tug your decisions in their direction.
How price anchoring shapes what you’re willing to pay
Modern pricing strategies are built around anchoring.
-
E‑commerce and retail sites frequently show a high “original” price crossed out next to a lower “discounted” price. The higher number becomes the anchor, making the lower number feel like a deal - even if it is still above fair value.
-
Tiered pricing (“Basic / Standard / Premium” or “Good / Better / Best”) uses a high‑priced top tier as an anchor so that the mid‑tier looks reasonable by comparison.
Behavioral‑pricing research finds that presenting a high initial anchor can increase customers’ willingness to pay and boost perceived value by substantial margins, even when the actual product and discount are modest. One field study found that certain anchor structures could shift perceived value by as much as 20 - 30%. [3]
Anchoring also interacts with effects like left‑digit bias - for example, $3.99 feeling much cheaper than $4.00 - because the first digit becomes the salient anchor your brain latches onto. [4]
Everyday money decisions where anchoring bites
Anchoring shows up in many personal‑finance contexts beyond shopping.
-
Salary and fee negotiations
- Negotiation research shows that the first credible number put on the table has a powerful pull on the final outcome. If an employer anchors low on salary, counteroffers often cluster closer to that low figure than you’d accept if you anchored first at your true target. [5]
-
Real‑estate pricing
- The initial listing price of a home heavily influences what buyers perceive as a fair range, even when later information suggests the home is mispriced. Reductions are compared back to the original anchor rather than to independent valuations.
-
Spending benchmarks
- Seeing friends spend a certain amount on weddings, vacations, or kids’ activities can anchor your own sense of what is “normal,” quietly raising your baseline budget even if your financial situation is very different.
For HENRYs, these anchors matter because they influence fixed commitments - mortgages, rent, lifestyle standards - that then constrain your ability to save and invest over time.
Anchoring and debt: the danger of minimum payments
Anchoring isn’t just a pricing trick; it also affects how you repay what you owe.
-
A large study on credit‑card behavior found that at least about 22% of near‑minimum payers appear to be anchoring on the minimum payment amount, leading them to repay debt much more slowly than they could afford. [6]
-
When the minimum is displayed prominently on statements, many people use it as a starting point and round up only slightly (for example, from $35 to $50), rather than setting payments based on goals like “clear this card in 12 months.”
Regulatory and academic reviews note that simply showing the minimum payment can introduce an anchoring bias that increases total interest costs and prolongs indebtedness. [7]
Interventions that highlight recommended payments to clear a balance faster, or that change how information is displayed, can shift anchors and improve repayment outcomes.
If you’re juggling multiple cards and loans, this bias can quietly cost you thousands in extra interest and years of extra repayment time.
Why high earners are still vulnerable
Anchoring exploits basic cognitive shortcuts that affect everyone, regardless of education or income.
For high‑earning professionals in cities like Toronto or Vancouver [8]:
-
Initial salary offers, benefit packages, and bonus structures can anchor expectations; later raises that seem large in percentage terms may still leave you anchored below your market value.
-
Seeing peers upgrade to certain neighbourhoods, car brands, or private‑school fees can anchor your sense of what “normal” looks like at your income level - even if those decisions leave little room for savings or investing.
-
Mortgage pre‑approvals (“You can borrow up to $X”) can become an anchor for home‑search budgets, pushing you to the upper limit of what’s technically possible rather than what’s comfortable or aligned with your long‑term goals
Anchors are especially powerful when you’re making big, infrequent decisions with lots of uncertainty - exactly the situations where many HENRYs find themselves.
Evidence‑based ways to defend against anchoring
You can’t stop your brain from anchoring, but you can design counter‑anchors and processes that reduce its impact.
1. Generate your own anchors before seeing theirs
Before looking at prices, offers, or lender numbers, do your own homework [9] :
-
For salaries, research credible ranges for your role, experience, and location, and decide in advance on a target, stretch, and walk‑away number.
-
For big purchases, set a budget range based on your financial plan, not on what lenders or sales pages show you.
Research on negotiation and behavioral decision‑making shows that people who set their own realistic anchors before entering discussions are less swayed by external anchors and achieve outcomes closer to their goals.
2. Reframe “was/now” pricing
When you see a discount from a high anchor:
-
Ignore the original price and ask, “If I saw only this final price, without the comparison, would it still be a good deal for me?”
-
Compare against alternative options and your own budget rather than against the retailer’s anchor.
-
This reframing shifts your reference point from the seller’s chosen number to your own priorities and opportunity costs.
3. Change your anchors on debt repayment
Instead of letting credit‑card minimums anchor your behavior:
-
Choose a target payoff timeline (for example, 12, 18, or 24 months) and calculate the required monthly payment; treat this as your anchor and hide or downplay the minimum in your own records.
-
If you can’t reach the optimal payment yet, anchor on the highest realistic amount you can sustain, not the smallest amount the issuer suggests.
Behavioral‑design research shows that simply presenting “recommended payments” that clear debt faster can significantly increase chosen payment amounts compared with showing only minimums. [10]
4. Add friction around high‑anchor environments [11]
For categories where you’re easily swayed - luxury shopping, big‑ticket electronics, or speculative investments - introduce friction:
-
Use cooling‑off periods (24 - 48 hours) before committing above a certain threshold.
-
Compare at least three alternatives before deciding, forcing your brain to anchor on a range of prices instead of a single number.
This helps counter the “one‑number hypnosis” that strong anchors create.
How PsyFi helps you unhook from bad anchors
PsyFi is designed to work with your brain’s shortcuts, including anchoring, rather than pretending you don’t have them.
-
Pre‑commitment anchors for big goals
- PsyFi lets you set your own anchors - like target savings rates, investment contributions, or safe housing cost percentages - so when you encounter external anchors (pre‑approval amounts, sale prices, salary offers), you can compare them against numbers that actually reflect your plan.
-
Debt‑repayment re‑anchoring
- For credit‑card and personal‑loan balances, PsyFi can show you “payoff in X months” payment suggestions and visually compare them to the issuer’s minimum, shifting your psychological anchor toward faster repayment.
-
Purchase and lifestyle prompts
- When the app detects large or recurring spending decisions - such as new rent levels, mortgages, or major subscriptions - it prompts questions like “What was your original budget?” and “How does this compare to your long‑term anchors?” before you commit.
-
Education bites on pricing tricks
- Short, in‑context explainers about price anchoring, “was/now” discounts, and left‑digit effects help you recognise when someone else is setting an anchor for you, so you can consciously decide whether to accept it.
By helping you see and override harmful anchors, PsyFi ensures that the first number you encounter isn’t the one that secretly controls your financial life.
–
References
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring_effect
2: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053535710001411
4: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022243720932532
5:
https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/negotiation-skills-daily/what-is-anchoring-in-negotiation/
6: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016726811300019X
7: https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/perils-minimum-payment/
10: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X18302721
11: https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/negotiation-skills-daily/price-anchoring-101/
