When you buy a stock, fund, or crypto you’re excited about, it suddenly feels like the world is full of evidence that you were right. You notice bullish articles, you remember positive comments from friends, and you quietly downplay any negative news. That tendency is called confirmation bias, and it is one of the most dangerous investing traps for otherwise smart, analytical people.
Confirmation bias is the tendency to seek, favor, and remember information that confirms your existing beliefs while discounting or ignoring information that challenges them. In investing, this bias can push you to over‑concentrate on certain ideas, hold losers too long, and miss early warning signs - all while feeling more confident than ever.
What is confirmation bias?
In psychology, confirmation bias is a well‑documented cognitive shortcut: once we form a view, we unconsciously look for evidence that supports it and filter out what doesn’t. [1][2]
We click articles whose headlines match what we already believe and skip the rest.
We remember the times our prediction was right and forget the times we were wrong.
We interpret ambiguous data in ways that fit our prior story.
Financial research and industry data show that this bias appears across all kinds of investors - retail, professional, and institutional. In online stock forums, for example, one study found that investors overwhelmingly preferred to read and engage with messages that supported their existing view of a stock, regardless of the strength of the underlying evidence.[3]
In other words, the more convinced you are, the more biased your information diet becomes.
Confirmation bias doesn’t feel like bias; it feels like doing research. That’s what makes it so dangerous.
Common patterns include:
Selective information gathering
Unbalanced research
Re‑interpreting bad news
Cherry‑picking past performance
Over time, this creates an echo chamber where your beliefs feel more and more certain, even as the objective risk/reward profile of your investments may be deteriorating.
The most immediate problem with confirmation bias is overconfidence.
Reviews of behavioral‑finance research show that investors prone to confirmation bias tend to trade more, hold more concentrated portfolios, and be more confident in their predictions than their actual skill would justify. [4]
Empirical studies find that stronger confirmation bias scores are associated with lower investment returns, partly because these investors ignore disconfirming evidence and delay necessary changes.
Three costly patterns emerge:
Over‑concentration in favorite ideas
Holding losers too long
Joining bubbles late and exiting crashes late
For HENRYs with limited time and emotional bandwidth, these patterns don’t just hurt returns - they increase stress, second‑guessing, and regret.
Today’s information environment makes confirmation bias harder to avoid.
Algorithmic feeds on social media and news apps learn what you click and show you more of the same, reinforcing your existing views. [6]
Thematic communities (Telegram groups, subreddits, Twitter/X threads) often revolve around specific strategies or tickers, creating group echo chambers where dissenting views are mocked or ignored. [7]
Content overload means you can always find some expert or chart that appears to support your stance, no matter how weak the overall evidence is.
Combine this with emotional stakes - your money, your identity as a “smart investor” - and confirmation bias becomes the default, not the exception.
Imagine a 32‑year‑old software engineer in Toronto who started investing seriously during a bull market. They made early gains in a handful of tech and growth names and now feel they “understand” that sector.
When they research:
They follow commentators who are consistently optimistic about tech and AI.
They skim bearish pieces, assuming those analysts “don’t get it” or are “too old‑school.”
They rarely read neutral or opposing sector analysis.
As valuations stretch, new risks emerge - regulatory scrutiny, increased competition, slowing revenue growth - but most of the content they consume either downplays these or reframes them as short‑term noise. They add more capital to familiar names and let their portfolio become heavily concentrated.
When a correction hits, they are surprised by the size of the drawdown, even though the risk was visible to anyone looking outside the bullish echo chamber.
You can’t eliminate confirmation bias, but you can learn to catch it in the act. Warning signs include:
You feel annoyed or dismissive when you encounter bearish views on your favorite holdings. [8]
You can talk for minutes about reasons to buy or hold, but struggle to list three serious reasons you might be wrong.
You only follow a narrow set of experts or creators who agree with your general outlook.
You say “the market is irrational” more often than “maybe my assumptions need updating.”
If any of these resonate, you are likely operating inside a self‑reinforcing information bubble.
Research and practitioner guidance suggest several practical ways to keep confirmation bias from quietly steering your portfolio.
Before you buy, write down:
Why you’re investing (drivers of value).
What you expect to happen (key metrics, narrative).
What would have to change for you to sell or reduce (thesis‑breaking events).
This turns vague conviction into testable hypotheses. When new information arrives, you can ask: “Does this support or contradict my written thesis?” rather than “How can I make this fit what I already believe?”
For every major position:
Spend at least 10–15 minutes deliberately searching for bearish or skeptical analysis (“risks of XYZ stock” instead of “XYZ stock to the moon”).
Summarize the strongest opposing arguments in your own words, even if you disagree.
Studies and practitioner reports show that explicitly considering disconfirming evidence can improve decision quality and reduce overconfidence. [9]
Systematic processes leave less room for biased improvisation.
Examples:
A simple checklist before increasing a position: “Has volatility increased? Has debt risen? Have growth assumptions changed?”
Risk rules such as maximum position sizes (e.g., no single stock above 10% of portfolio) and maximum sector limits.
By setting rules in advance, you make it harder for a single, highly confirmed belief to dominate your entire portfolio.
Instead of scrolling and trading in the same session:
Have dedicated research sessions where you gather diverse information, both bullish and bearish.
Have separate decision sessions where you act based on what your plan and checklist say, not on the last article or tweet you saw.
This reduces the “recency” advantage of confirming information and gives cooler reasoning a chance.
5. Track decisions and outcomes
Keep a simple investment journal:
What you bought or sold.
Why did you do it?
What evidence you used.
Reviewing this periodically can reveal patterns - like only recording bullish points or repeatedly ignoring the same type of risk - that show where confirmation bias is creeping in. [10]
How PsyFi helps you avoid confirmation‑driven mistakes
PsyFi is built around exactly these behavioral traps, including confirmation bias, and translates best practices into daily, low‑friction habits.
Structured decision templates
Diverse‑source nudges
Position‑size and concentration alerts
Post‑mortem reviews
By making it easier to see and challenge your own narratives, PsyFi helps ensure your portfolio is guided by balanced evidence and long‑term goals - not just the loudest voices that happen to agree with you.
–
References:
1: https://www.simplypsychology.org/confirmation-bias.html
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
3: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/isre.2013.0492
4: https://online.mason.wm.edu/blog/behavioral-biases-that-can-impact-investing-decisions
5: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1639470
6: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter_bubble
8: https://www.britannica.com/science/confirmation-bias