3 Research Backed Ways to Stop Keeping Up With the Joneses in Days
Use three research backed, mental health first practices: self compassion, social savoring, and simple micro habits to cut comparison driven spending and...
Keeping up with the Joneses is a pattern of upward social comparison in which people match or exceed a peer group’s visible spending to maintain status. It raises envy, erodes self-esteem, and often leads to lifestyle inflation that undercuts saving. The pattern responds to specific tools: self-compassion practices, a technique called social savoring, and small budgeting habits tied to measurable financial well-being.
TL;DR:
Limiting passive social media use and practicing social savoring can reduce upward social comparison and help improve self-esteem.
Mindful habits like tracking spending and delaying large purchases directly counteract lifestyle creep driven by peer comparison.
Comparing oneself against local norms and reducing the visibility of peers’ purchases decreases the inflation of perceived normal spending.
Cultivating self-compassion and pairing it with behavioral micro-habits can effectively lower social comparison triggers and improve financial well-being.
Monitoring how often comparison influences spending and setting pre-commitment rules can help prevent a cycle of envy, overspending, and financial stress.
Table of Contents
The psychology of envy, status anxiety, and social comparison
The financial fallout: lifestyle creep and lower financial well-being
Where the phrase comes from and what it actually means
The phrase traces back to a 1913 comic strip, “Keeping Up with the Joneses,” which followed a family bankrupting itself trying to match wealthier neighbours. The comic’s premise still describes the behaviour: spending driven by a neighbour’s visible purchases rather than your own needs or goals.
Not every upgrade counts. Aspiration becomes a problem when the goal is relative standing rather than a want you’d hold regardless of what anyone else owns.
Ordinary aspiration: you want a reliable car because yours keeps breaking down.
Status-driven consumption: you want a newer car because a neighbour just bought one.
The distinction matters because the fixes differ. Ordinary wants to respond to budgeting. Status-driven wants respond to psychological interventions that interrupt the comparison itself.
The psychology of envy, status anxiety, and social comparison
Social comparison theory holds that people evaluate themselves by measuring against others, and the direction of that comparison shapes the outcome. Upward comparisons (looking at those who appear to have more) tend to lower self-evaluation, while downward comparisons tend to raise it. Most status-driven spending is fuelled by the upward kind.
Envy is the hinge between comparison and mood. When upward comparison triggers envy rather than admiration, it can negatively mediate self-esteem and positively mediate depressive symptoms, according to research tracking social network site use among young adults.
Maximizers, people who seek the objectively best option in every decision, are more likely than satisficers to sacrifice real value for relative advantage, which makes status comparisons especially costly for them.
Present bias and financial myopia push people to weight today’s social standing over next year’s savings balance.
Perfectionistic self-presentation, the need to appear flawless to peers, amplifies the pressure to match visible purchases.
Two studies tracking upward comparisons on social platforms found that exposure and intensity of those comparisons negatively predicted self-esteem and positively predicted depressive symptoms. The effect held even after accounting for overall time spent on the platforms.
When social comparison turns into a mental health problem
Comparison itself is not pathological. It becomes a concern when it is frequent, upward, and tied to passive consumption of others’ lives rather than active connection with them. A body of research links this pattern to measurable harm.
Passive social media use, scrolling without posting, commenting, or messaging, predicts higher social comparison and envy, and a review of studies on Facebook use, comparison, and envy found these two factors mediate the link to lower affective well-being and greater depressive symptoms. Separately, exposure to upward comparisons has been shown to mediate lower self-esteem and higher depressive symptoms among young adults using social network sites.
When comparison stops being occasional and starts shaping daily mood, self-worth, or spending decisions, it has crossed from a normal social habit into a pattern worth addressing directly.
Persistent low mood, loss of interest in previously enjoyable activities, or spending that interferes with bills and savings goals are signs the pattern has moved past the ordinary. At that point, a conversation with a mental health professional is a more appropriate next step than another budgeting app.
How social media turns comparison into a constant pressure
Social feeds are built around curated highlight reels, vacations, renovations, new purchases, rarely the debt or stress behind them. Passive scrolling through that content, without any reciprocal interaction, is the behaviour most consistently tied to higher comparison and envy.
Curated content skews upward by design, so your reference point for “normal” spending quietly inflates.
Scheduled, time-boxed checking reduces the passive scrolling that drives comparison without requiring you to quit a platform.
Unfollowing or muting accounts that reliably trigger comparison is a low-effort edit with an outsized effect on mood.
A pilot study found that participants who practiced a short social-savoring exercise reported higher state self-esteem (P=.01) and reduced social comparison at posttest. The intervention was a seven-minute animated video plus brief daily practice, evidence that meaningful shifts in comparison don’t require months of therapy to start.
The financial fallout: lifestyle creep and lower financial well-being
Status-driven spending rarely shows up as one bad purchase. It shows up as lifestyle creep: each raise or windfall gets absorbed into a slightly nicer apartment, car, or wardrobe before any of it reaches savings. Experimental research on status-seeking shows subjects will spend a measurable share of expected income to match peers, often at the direct expense of saving.
Matching a peer group’s visible spending tends to reduce the saving rate that would otherwise follow a raise.
Inequality in a reference group changes the incentive to spend conspicuously, since relative rank depends on how the group’s distribution is structured.
CFPB data shows that people with low financial well-being are more likely to lack emergency savings and to struggle with housing costs and debt, regardless of income level.
That last point is the one worth sitting with: financial well-being, as the CFPB measures it, tracks behaviours like planning and tracking spending more closely than it tracks raw income. You can earn well and still score low if status spending is draining the gap between income and savings. Watching for lifestyle creep after a raise is one of the simplest checks available.
What actually reduces comparison-driven spending
Three approaches have research behind them, and they work on different parts of the problem: the emotional response, the social trigger, and the spending behaviour itself.
Self-compassion. Observational research found that higher self-compassion is linked to lower social media addiction, with gratitude partly explaining the effect. A scoping review of the broader evidence base concluded that self-compassion-oriented interventions show promise for buffering social media’s adverse effects, though more research is needed to standardize measurement.
Social savoring. This technique reframes someone else’s good news as a shared source of joy rather than a threat to your own standing. In a pilot study, practicing it increased state self-esteem and reduced comparison within a single testing session, and reminders helped participants sustain the practice day to day.
Behavioural finance micro-habits. Tracking spending, pre-committing to savings transfers, and setting a short delay before big purchases are the kinds of planning behaviours the CFPB associates with higher financial well-being, independent of income.
Pro Tip: Pair one psychological tool with one financial habit, like a two-minute self-compassion check before you open your banking app, so the emotional fix and the behavioural fix reinforce each other.
A short daily routine you can start this week
None of this requires a overhaul. A short, repeatable routine built from the research above is enough to notice a shift within days.
Morning expense check (2 minutes): glance at yesterday’s spending before opening any social app, so your first financial reference point is your own data, not a feed.
Self-compassion pause (2 minutes): when you notice envy or the urge to buy something to match a peer, name the feeling without judgment before deciding whether to act on it.
One social-savoring moment (1 minute): when you see someone else’s good news, pause and genuinely wish them well before scrolling on.
Track two simple metrics weekly: how many days you logged expenses, and how many times you caught a comparison before acting on it. A short daily log, kept in a notebook or a financial journal, makes both habits visible enough to stick.
Pro Tip: Set a pre-commitment rule, like a 48-hour wait on any purchase over a fixed amount, so the decision gets made by your calmer, planning self rather than your in-the-moment comparison self.
Why culture and income shape how hard the pressure hits
Keeping up with the Joneses isn’t distributed evenly. The reference group you compare against, and how visible that group’s spending is, depends heavily on where you live and who surrounds you.
In cultures that prize individual achievement and visible success, status tends to attach to possessions you can display: cars, homes, clothing. In cultures built around collective identity, status can attach just as strongly to group outcomes, like a family’s reputation or a community’s shared standing, which changes what “keeping up” even looks like. Neither pattern is inherently healthier, but they point toward different vulnerabilities.
Income and inequality within a reference group matter just as much as culture. Research on conspicuous consumption shows that the incentive to spend visibly depends on the structure of inequality within the comparison group, not just the absolute gap between you and the top earner. A narrower, more compressed income range in a neighbourhood or workplace can intensify status competition, because small differences in spending become more noticeable and more meaningful for rank.
Socioeconomic mobility, or the lack of it, adds another layer. In a social group where relative position feels fixed, status spending can become less about catching up and more about maintaining a position that otherwise feels precarious. People in a geographic area where perceived cost of living outpaces their actual expenses often misread what “normal” spending looks like, which is part of why grounding comparisons in local, actual costs rather than peer impressions is worth doing before cutting a budget.
What widespread comparison costs a society over time
When status-driven spending becomes the default rather than the exception, the effects extend past individual bank accounts. Aggregate saving rates soften as households across an income range direct a larger share of earnings toward visible consumption rather than savings or investment, a dynamic consistent with the experimental finding that status-seeking can reduce optimal saving behaviour at the individual level.
There’s also a slower cultural effect: as curated, upward-skewing content becomes the default reference point for “normal” life, the baseline for what counts as an acceptable home, car, or vacation quietly ratchets upward for everyone exposed to it, not just the people initially trying to keep pace. That shift helps explain why financial stress can rise across a population even when average income is climbing, since the comparison point is rising just as fast or faster.
The psychological toll compounds too. A population where upward comparison and envy are common fixtures of daily life, through feeds rather than face-to-face encounters, is a population carrying a chronic, low-grade version of the same mood and self-esteem risks documented at the individual level. None of this is irreversible. The same interventions that help one person, self-compassion, social savoring, and behaviour-based financial tracking, scale reasonably well because they’re brief, teachable, and don’t depend on anyone’s income changing first.
My take on the comparison trap
The advice to “just stop comparing” misses the point entirely: comparison is automatic, not optional, so the useful question is what you do with it once it happens. The research that convinces me most is the social-savoring work, because it doesn’t ask anyone to suppress envy. It redirects it into something that costs nothing and takes a few minutes.
The harder truth is that financial habits and psychological habits have to move together. Budgeting without addressing the comparison that triggers overspending just produces a shorter runway to the next slip.
— Maanya
How PsyFi supports people caught in the comparison cycle
If comparison-driven spending keeps undoing your budget, the gap usually isn’t willpower, it’s that generic financial advice doesn’t account for the specific trigger behind each purchase. PsyFi’s AI engine analyzes your actual spending patterns and behavioural biases to build a saving and investing plan around what’s really driving your decisions, with real-time coaching instead of one-size-fits-all tips.
Part of that structure includes ongoing research into behaviour change, the same kind of evidence this article draws on, rather than static advice that never updates. A 7-day free trial leads into Premium Monthly for $9.99 per month, or Premium Annual for $69.99 per year for anyone ready to commit further. PsyFi supports the financial side of this pattern. It does not replace therapy or clinical care when low mood or anxiety needs that kind of support.
This article is general information, not a substitute for advice from a qualified doctor. Consult a qualified healthcare professional about your own circumstances before acting on anything here.
FAQ
What is the psychology behind keeping up with the Joneses?
The psychology centres on upward social comparison, where people measure their own worth or success against peers who appear to have more. That comparison, when it triggers envy rather than admiration, is linked to lower self-esteem and higher depressive symptoms in research on young adults.
What does the Bible say about keeping up with the Joneses?
The Bible doesn’t reference the phrase directly, since it comes from a 20th-century comic strip, but several passages caution against covetousness and envy of a neighbour’s possessions. Readers looking for a specific scriptural answer should consult a pastor or a direct reading of the text, since interpretations vary across traditions.
What is the “keeping up with the Joneses” theory?
It’s less a formal theory than a popular description of social comparison theory applied to consumption: people gauge their own status by comparing visible spending to that of their peers. The term originated in a 1913 comic strip about a family bankrupting itself trying to match wealthier neighbours, and it’s used today to describe status-driven rather than need-driven spending.
Sources
Intervening on social comparisons on social media: electronic daily diary pilot study
The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression (review)
Data Spotlight: Financial well-being in America, from 2017 to 2020 | CFPB
The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health
Recommended
This content is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. PsyFi provides financial coaching tools and behavioral insights, not regulated advisory services. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor or tax professional regarding your personal situation before making financial decisions.
Keep reading
- 30.9% Never Return: Panic Selling Psychology, Evidence and AI FixesDiscover why 30.9% of panic sellers never return, what peer‑reviewed data shows, and regulator‑backed steps plus AI tools to prevent selling at market lows.
- Lifestyle Creep: Why Your Raises Disappear and How to Stop It
- Impulse Buying Brain Science: 3 Moves to Resist the UrgeLearn the neuroscience behind impulse buys and three science-backed moves—pause, add friction, and make total cost visible—to stop impulsive spending and...
